JOB & DATA Search

Here,Find what you want:

Monday, April 16, 2012

Schlumberger CDs for drilling engineering


interactive show with visual and vocal effects illustrating drilling

&oil production.

the CDs is explained in 6 languages:

:: Arabic

:: English

:: French

:: Spanish

:: Indonesian

:: Portuguese



contents:
Cd1:An introduction to drilling rigs and main components of drill string
Cd2:BOP Equipments
Cd3:drilling Fluids and Mud Test
Cd4:Mud circulation and treating Equipements
Cd5:Hoisting Equipments
Cd6:Rotating Equipments & Mast and Substructure
Cd7:Pipe Handling
Cd8:Casing and Cementing
Cd9:Well logging, Mud logging and Drill stem test
Cd10: Power System and instrument



Click here to get working download links for CDs

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Thursday, April 5, 2012

Gus Archie "Undergraduate" Scholarship Program

The Gus Archie Memorial Scholarship is supported by the Archie Fund of the SPE Foundation and awards an outstanding student who plans to enter a university and pursue an undergraduate degree in petroleum engineering. The student will receive $6,000 per year for up to four years of university study.
Eligibility
To apply, you must:
*Intend to enroll in petroleum engineering in a recognized university program according to your country or region, leading to an undergraduate degree in petroleum engineering. 
*Upload an appraisal from your high school principal, adviser or counselor with your academic history .
*Complete the electronic submission process .
If awarded, each semester, you must: 
*Be enrolled in a petroleum engineering class by the beginning of the second year of university. 
*Remain in petroleum engineering degree program. 
*Maintain at least 2/3 of a full academic load. 
*Have and maintain a satisfactory average of scores/marks for the current semester and cumulative total.
To Apply:
1.Upload your letters of recommendation indicating your aptitude, leadership qualities, character and responsibility .
2.Upload your university entrance exam scores/marks with documentation explaining how to interpret the scores .
3.Verify your intent to study petroleum engineering and your agreement to the statements listed by checking the “I Agree” box and then click "Submit".
NOTICE
*Create an account if this is your first time applying for this scholarship online (you will not be able to sign in with your SPE login) .
*Ensure you answer all questions and add your essay .
DEADLINE: 30 April

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Henry DeWitt Smith Fellowship


California Institute of Technology Henry DeWitt Smith’s example of inspired leadership, professional success, personal integrity, and boundless dedication was his heritage to the mining industry which he served all of his adult life. In his memory, the Henry DeWitt Smith Fellowship was created by his wife Ellen Burke Smith.

Fellowship Deadline

Applications must be received on or before 1 June each year. Applications received on 2 June and after will not be considered.

To Apply complete online application.

Requirements for an Application

To be eligible, you must:

  • Be pursuing a graduate degree (master’s or PhD) in petroleum engineering or a related field
  • Be an SPE member
  • Have another source of income (job, family support, other fellowships)

The requirements include:

  • A completed online application
  • Uploaded transcripts from all universities attended
  • (2) uploaded letters of recommendation (one from a current university faculty member)
  • An essay submitted online with application:
      • If awarded this fellowship, what would you do with your education to make Henry DeWitt Smith delighted that you are the beneficiary?

Because US law prohibits provision of certain services to individuals residing in embargoed countries, not all applicants may be eligible to participate in the Henry DeWitt Smith Fellowship program. Please click here for more information.


approved BSEE gives OK to Shell’s oil spill response contingency plan for Beaufort Sea

In another step toward opening the gate to Shell’s long planned Alaska Arctic drilling program, the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, or BSEE, has approved Shell’s oil spill response plan for the company’s planned exploratory drilling in the Beaufort Sea.

“We have conducted an exhaustive review of Shell’s response plan for the Beaufort Sea,” said BSEE Director James Watson on March 28 when announcing the response plan approval. “Our focus moving forward will be to hold Shell accountable and to follow-up with exercises, reviews and inspections to ensure that all personnel and equipment are positioned and ready.”

In February the agency approved a similar spill response plan for Shell’s planned exploration drilling in the Chukchi Sea. The company wants to drill up to two wells in the Beaufort Sea and up to three wells in the Chukchi Sea during this year’s summer and fall Arctic open water season.

Shell is assembling a large spill response fleet, to support its drilling operations, including on-site oil spill response vessels and a new well capping and containment system for emergency use.

Plan upgrades

BSEE says that Shell’s latest Beaufort Sea response plan includes major upgrades to previous plans, including a three-fold increase in the size of the worst case spill scenario that the plan must accommodate; the extension over a longer timeframe of the oil trajectory mapping of a worst case scenario; the identification of equipment for dispersant application and in-situ burning; and a more detailed logistical plan for obtaining out-of-region spill response equipment.

“Approval of Shell’s Beaufort Sea Oil Spill Response Plan (OSRP), on the heels of the recent approval of our Chukchi Sea oil spill response plan, is another major milestone achieved,” Shell spokesman Curtis Smith told Petroleum News in a March 28 email. “It further reinforces that Shell’s approach to Arctic exploration is aligned with the high standards the Department of Interior expects from an offshore leader and adds to our confidence that drilling will finally commence in the shallow waters off Alaska this summer.”

Political support

Members of Alaska’s Congressional delegation expressed their support for Shell’s plans.

“Today’s approval by Interior marks one of the last major hurdles that Shell must overcome to explore for oil in Alaska’s northern waters this summer,” said Sen. Lisa Murkowski. “This is good news for Alaska and the nation, which needs the energy, jobs and economic activity, responsible exploration and, ultimately, production will bring … As the commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard has testified, the homework is done and we are ready and waiting to move forward with safe and responsible exploration of our huge energy resources.”

“As we continue to push the White House to develop Alaska’s vast energy potential, approval of this oil spill response plan affirms that we are moving in the right direction toward opening the Arctic and helping to achieve America’s national and economic security while creating thousands of much-needed jobs,” said Sen. Mark Begich.

Opposition

But the company faces vehement opposition to its drilling plans from environmental organizations and some Native groups who are concerned about the risk of marine pollution from an oil spill, and who say the too little is known about the Arctic offshore environment to risk the potential impacts of offshore drilling. Oral arguments in an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit against the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s approval of Shell’s Beaufort Sea exploration plan are scheduled for May 15.

Those opposed to Arctic offshore drilling say that the oil industry has not demonstrated the feasibility of cleaning up an oil spill in Arctic conditions using available equipment, and that Arctic response plans have more to do with theory than with practice.

“It’s deeply disappointing that President Obama is choosing to ignore the enormous risks of opening the Arctic Ocean to oil drilling,” said Miyoko Sakashita, oceans director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “All signs point to environmental disaster if an oil spill were to occur in the harsh Arctic waters — it’s just absurd that Shell’s unproven response plan got the green light.”

“There is no viable way to clean up an oil spill in the extreme conditions of America’s Arctic Ocean, yet the Obama administration continues to give the green light to Shell Oil’s plans for drilling this summer,” said Cindy Shogan, executive director of the Alaska Wilderness League. “The Arctic Ocean is prone to hurricane-force storms, 20-foot swells, sea ice up to 25 feet thick, subzero temperatures and months-long darkness. What’s more, the Arctic has extremely limited infrastructure.”

Pre-emptive action

Shell maintains that its contingency arrangements are adequate to deal with any well control issue that might arise. And, as a pre-emptive action against possible last-minute litigation against the approval of its Chukchi Sea spill response plan, the company has asked the federal District Court in Alaska to verify that BSEE had properly approved the Chukchi Sea plan.

“We maintain that the unprecedented amount of time, technology and resources we have dedicated to preparing for an extremely unlikely worst-case scenario makes Shell’s oil spill response plan second to none in the world,” Smith said in his March 28 email. “That plan includes the assembly of a 24/7 on-site, near shore and onshore Arctic-class oil spill response fleet, collaboration with the U.S. Coast Guard and a newly engineered Arctic capping system.”

Shell is waiting on the outcome of an appeal in the Environmental Appeals Board against the Environmental Protection Agency air quality permit for the Kulluk, the floating drilling platform that the company plans to use in the Beaufort Sea. And before it can commence drilling the company still needs to obtain well-specific drilling permits from BSEE and approvals from the appropriate government agencies for the unintended disturbance of marine mammals.


Oil & Gas Handbook

This Book is Recommended By Eng: Willson



Reservoir Engineering Inrto.

Naturally occurring hydrocarbon systems found in petroleum reservoirs
are mixtures of organic compounds which exhibit multiphase
behavior over wide ranges of pressures and temperatures. These hydrocarbon
accumulations may occur in the gaseous state, the liquid state, the
solid state, or in various combinations of gas, liquid, and solid.
These differences in phase behavior, coupled with the physical properties
of reservoir rock that determine the relative ease with which gas and
liquid are transmitted or retained, result in many diverse types of hydrocarbon
reservoirs with complex behaviors. Frequently, petroleum engineers
have the task to study the behavior and characteristics of a petroleum
reservoir and to determine the course of future development and
production that would maximize the profit.
The objective of this chapter is to review the basic principles of reservoir
fluid phase behavior and illustrate the use of phase diagrams in classifying
types of reservoirs and the native hydrocarbon systems.
CLASSIFICATION OF RESERVOIRS
AND RESERVOIR

Petroleum reservoirs are broadly classified as oil or gas reservoirs.
These broad classifications are further subdivided depending on:
• The composition of the reservoir hydrocarbon mixture
• Initial reservoir pressure and temperature
• Pressure and temperature of the surface production
The conditions under which these phases exist are a matter of considerable
practical importance. The experimental or the mathematical determinations
of these conditions are conveniently expressed in different
types of diagrams commonly called phase diagrams. One such diagram
is called the pressure-temperature diagram.
Pressure-Temperature Diagram
Figure 1-1 shows a typical pressure-temperature diagram of a multicomponent
system with a specific overall composition. Although a different
hydrocarbon system would have a different phase diagram, the
general configuration is similar.



These multicomponent pressure-temperature diagrams are essentially
used to:
• Classify reservoirs
• Classify the naturally occurring hydrocarbon systems
• Describe the phase behavior of the reservoir fluid
To fully understand the significance of the pressure-temperature diagrams,
it is necessary to identify and define the following key points on
these diagrams:
• Cricondentherm (Tct)—The Cricondentherm is defined as the maximum
temperature above which liquid cannot be formed regardless of
pressure (point E). The corresponding pressure is termed the Cricondentherm
pressure pct.
• Cricondenbar (pcb)—The Cricondenbar is the maximum pressure above
which no gas can be formed regardless of temperature (point D). The
corresponding temperature is called the Cricondenbar temperature Tcb.
• Critical point—The critical point for a multicomponent mixture is
referred to as the state of pressure and temperature at which all intensive
properties of the gas and liquid phases are equal (point C). At the
critical point, the corresponding pressure and temperature are called the
critical pressure pc and critical temperature Tc of the mixture.
• Phase envelope (two-phase region)—The region enclosed by the bubble-
point curve and the dew-point curve (line BCA), wherein gas and
liquid coexist in equilibrium, is identified as the phase envelope of the
hydrocarbon system.
• Quality lines—The dashed lines within the phase diagram are called
quality lines. They describe the pressure and temperature conditions for
equal volumes of liquids. Note that the quality lines converge at the
critical point (point C).
• Bubble-point curve—The bubble-point curve (line BC) is defined as
the line separating the liquid-phase region from the two-phase region.
• Dew-point curve—The dew-point curve (line AC) is defined as the
line separating the vapor-phase region from the two-phase region.

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

Search This Blog

Loading

Subscribe via email

button_subscribenow.png (314×89) Learn petro engineering daily

Find Us on Facebook: